Legal Opinion

Monaco v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEW

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1989No. 35 M.D. Appeal Dkt. 1988PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

This appeal requires this Court to determine whether the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (“Board”) that the appellants, Lea Monaco and Alba Caruso, had not been terminated from their employment but had voluntarily *44quit. The appeal centers around two issues; (1) the intent of an employee to voluntarily quit, and (2) the sufficiency of “necessary and compelling” reasons to excuse voluntary termination.

This appeal is the result of a heated dispute between the agent of an employer, Jacob Siegel Company,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Deiss v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Genetin v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Roberts v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. National Freight, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Brunswick Hotel & Conference Center, LLC v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Casper Iron & Metal, Inc. v. Unemployment Insurance Commission of the Department of EmploymentWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Mathis v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Bell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Key v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API