Legal Opinion

Hoyer v. United Dressed Beef Co.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided June 14, 1946No. 5208PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YANKWICH, District Judge.

By this action, George Henry Hoyer, the plaintiff, a discharged soldier, seeks to compel his restoration by the defendants, to his pre-war employment as hog buyer at his previous salary of $60 per week.

The defendants are meat packers. The action demands the benefit of the remedy established by the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 308(b).

In MacMillan v. Montecito Country Club, D.C.Cal., 1946, 65 F.Supp. 240, 242, I had occasion to interpret this statute. The problem there involved was somewhat different,—whether a person occupied a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Republic Steel Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Marshall Field & Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Kennedy v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Kay v. General Cable CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  5. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. KinslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Thomas Henry Carter v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Thompson v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1948
  3. Strand v. Hansen Seaway Service, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  4. Foor v. Torrington Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
  5. Kemp v. John Chatillon & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API