Legal Opinion
Ingles v. Neiman Marcus Group
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided July 30, 1997No. Civil Action H-95-5447PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CRONE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the court are Defendant The Neiman Marcus Group d/b/a Neiman Marcus’s (“NMG”) Motion for Summary Judgment (# 22) and Plaintiff Robert J. Ingles’s (“Ingles”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (# 24). NMG seeks summary judgment on Ingles’s claim that it violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Ingles seeks partial summary judgment on the issue of NMG’s liability under the ADA.
Having reviewed the pending motions, the submissions of the parties, the pleadings, and the applicable law,…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- John Lawson, Sr. v. Csx Transportation, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Rohr v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Brower v. Continental Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Krikelis v. Vassar CollegeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Banks v. Hit or Miss, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.