Legal Opinion
Rohr v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 13, 2009No. 06-16527PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAER, Senior District Judge:
Larry Rohr appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District (“Salt River”). Rohr, who is an insulin-dependent type 2 diabetic, brought suit for employment discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq. Because the district court erred in concluding that Rohr was neither “disabled” nor a “qualified individual” under the ADA, we vacate the district court’s order of summary judgment and remand for further…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Fraser v. GoodaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Bates v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Carreras v. Sajo, Garcia & PartnersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- J.D. by Doherty v. Colonial Williamsburg Found.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Nunies v. HIE Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Bender v. Norfolk Southern Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- David Atkins v. Ken Salazar, SecretaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.