Legal Opinion

Rainier Avenue Corp. v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1972No. 41632PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeill, J.

This is the second appeal in a quiet title action wherein plaintiff/respondent claims vacated portions of streets as successor in interest of the dedicators of a plat.

The first appeal was from a dismissal at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case. Rainier Ave. Corp. v. Seattle, 76 Wn.2d 800, 459 P.2d 40 (1969). We reversed and granted a new trial. At the second trial, judgment was entered quieting title to the subject property in the plaintiff. Defendant City of Seattle appeals.

The facts are detailed in the first appeal (Rainier Ave. Corp. v. Seattle, supra) and a brief summary will suffice…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Finch v. MatthewsWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Puget Sound Alumni of Kappa Sigma, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Bradley v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Frye v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Schwede v. Hemrich Bros. Brewing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Donald v. City of VancouverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  2. Roeder Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Kiely v. GravesWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. City of Seattle v. P. B. Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  5. City of Cabot v. BriansCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API