Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. P. B. Investment Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 15, 1974No. 2655-1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, C.J.

— Does a first-class city have the authority to settle a private claim against it by granting the claimant the right to use a portion of a public street for a certain length of time? Assuming arguendo that such an authority does exist, may the city subsequently summarily order the private use of the street to cease when such use conflicts with the public need to make full use of the street notwithstanding the fact that the term of private use originally granted has not yet expired? These are the primary questions presented by this appeal.

The undisputed facts necessary to an understanding of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Finch v. MatthewsWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State Ex. Rel. York v. B. of C. Com'rsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Winkenwerder v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State Ex Rel. Shannon v. SponburghWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Strand v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1943

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of the University v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Meadowdale Neighborhood Committee v. City of EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  3. Billington Builders Supply, Inc. v. City of YakimaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. Washington Securities & Investment Corp. v. Horse Heaven Heights, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Rel v. Douglas County Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API