Legal Opinion

Downton v. Vandemark

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 6, 1983No. C 82-444PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

WALINSKI, District Judge.

This cause came to be heard upon the plaintiff’s objections to a Report & Recommendation of Magistrate James G. Carr. In response to a motion filed by the defendant, the Magistrate recommended the dismissal of the plaintiff’s complaint as untimely. The court rejects the Magistrate’s report, and for the following reasons the complaint is dismissed in part.

I

This suit arises under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the common law of Ohio. Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332 and 1343(3). The requisite amount in controversy…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Thomas Kaiser v. William CahnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. Chester Lee Mohler v. Earl Miller, Orville Phillippe, John Truchly, Joseph Brown and Peppino PuleoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  4. Ishler v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Keaton Co. v. KolbyOhio Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moeller v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Walker v. City of LakewoodDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1990
  3. Bailey v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Bailey v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Moeller v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API