Walker v. City of Lakewood
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BATTISTI, District Judge.
In this pro se, civil rights rights suit, brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, 1985, & 1986, the parties have made timely objections to a well-written Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of Magistrate Streepy, filed October 3, 1988. The Defendants had filed Motions to Dismiss or for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the Court REJECTS, in part, and ACCEPTS, in part, the conclusions of the Magistrate; accordingly, this case is REMANDED to the Magistrate for further proceedings.
As to the Defendants’ statute of limitations defense, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hardin v. StraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Freddie Sevier v. Kenneth TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ashiegbu v. PurvianceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1998
- Ashdown v. BuchananDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021