Bailey v. Tucker
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
533 Pa. 237 (1993)
621 A.2d 108
Clarence BAILEY, a/k/a Clarence W. Bailey and Charles E. Bailey, Appellants,
v.
Robert E. TUCKER, and Daniel M. Berger, Appellees.
Gregory TRICE, Appellant,
v.
Robert B. MOZENTER, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued March 11, 1988.
Reargued September 27, 1990.
Decided February 26, 1993.
H. David Rothman, for appellants Clarence and Charles Bailey.
Andrew Jackson and Mark Feinman, for appellant George Trice.
Deborah D. Otszewski, David H. Trushel & Associates, for appellees Robert E. Tucker and Daniel M. Berger.
Ernest Tannelli, Jeffrey B. Albert, Fox, Rothschild,…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Zappala; Concurrence · Papadakos; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Tower v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Krahn v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.