Legal Opinion

Stone v. Stone

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 2000No. 99-195PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Chief Justice.

Appearing pro se, appellant Michael Stone (Father) attacks a district court order that determined him in arrears in child support for over $11,000. Because Father has presented no reasonable cause for appeal, we affirm and impose sanctions pursuant to W.R.A.P. 10.05.

ISSUES

Father offers the following statement of issues presented for review:

A. The Seventh Judicial District, the Honorable W. Thomas Sullins, Presiding Judge failed to consider the VERIFIED NOTICE OF FACT AND DATE ERROR, Filed on May 12, 1999 after the Hearing on May 6, 1999. This was due to the fact that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Broyles v. BroylesWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hamburg v. HeilbrunWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Sharpe v. SharpeWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Amen, Inc. v. BarnardWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Barnes v. BarnesWyoming Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Welch v. WelchWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Dorsett v. MooreWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Drake v. McCullohWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Stonham v. WidiastutiWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Deede v. DeedeWyoming Supreme Court · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API