Legal Opinion

FountainCourt Homeowners' Ass'n v. FountainCourt Development, LLC

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 6, 2014No. C075333CV; A147420PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

This appeal arises from a garnishment proceeding in which FountainCourt Homeowners’ Association and FountainCourt Condominium Owners’ Association (collectively, FountainCourt1) alleged that American Family Mutual Insurance Company (American Family) was legally obligated to pay the unsatisfied portion of a judgment that FountainCourt had recovered against Sideco, Inc. (Sideco), American Family’s insured. The trial court agreed with FountainCourt, and American Family appeals the resulting supplemental judgment — which awarded FountainCourt $433,958.16 against American Family — and a subsequent…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Hale v. GroceOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ReuterOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Wyoming Sawmills, Inc. v. Transportation InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. FountainCourt Homeowners' Ass'n v. FountainCourt Development, LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Twigg v. OpsahlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. Lansing v. John Does 1-5Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API