Legal Opinion

Jones v. Saah

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 12, 1971No. [No. 328, September Term, 1970.]PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinan, J.

In December, 1966, the appellees (Saahs) entered into identical contracts with appellants Jones and Ray. Each contract provided that the appellants would sell certain lots to the Saahs for $28,800, and that each of the appellant-sellers would take back a first deed of trust for $20,-400 in order to finance the purchase of the property, this deed of trust to be subordinated to a construction loan should the Saahs build on the property.

Each of the contracts was “subject to 1-1 zoning approval to be obtained and paid for by the purchaser [appellees] and each contract contained the following…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barnes v. EusterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Sears v. Polan's 5¢ to $1.00 Store of Annapolis, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Metz v. HeflinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Home Insurance v. F & F Clothing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1968

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McGinnis v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. Brotman v. RoelofsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Connolley v. HarrisonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. Litvak v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Knight v. Princess Builders, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API