Legal Opinion
Home Insurance v. F & F Clothing Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 5, 1968No. [No. 279, September Term, 1967.]PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinan, J.
The appellees filed suit on a contract of insurance against the appellant insurer in the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The claim arose out of a theft of the appellee’s goods and merchandise from the company vehicle against which loss the appellant had issued a Truckmen’s and Motor Carrier’s insurance policy. The parties have stipulated that the relevant portions of this policy are as follows :
“I. Subject to the following terms and conditions this policy covers:
2. Lawful goods and merchandise the property of the Named Insured or sold by them and in due course of delivery, wdiile loaded for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- J. G. Ries & Sons, Inc. v. Automobile Insurance Co. of HartfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
- Druss Stores, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1960
3Cited by8 opinions
- Boonton Handbag Co. v. Home Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Franklin v. Washington General InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Jones v. SaahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Burbank Generators, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Banker's Note, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.