Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Euster

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 7, 1965No. [No. 44, September Term, 1965.]PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

This case would seem to have become moot by the time it reached us for decision. The appellant’s (the buyer’s) amended bill, filed in May 1963, asking for specific performance of a contract dated August 7, 1959, for the sale to him by the appellees for cash of a tract of real estate in Montgomery County was dismissed on demurrer without leave to amend because the chancellor construed a provision of the contract that “this sale [is] subject to the obtaining of necessary zoning for the erection of general offices for use of doctors within the next zoning application term” as a condition…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Griffith v. ScheungrabCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Chapman v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Doering v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  4. Bluthenthal & Bickart v. May Advertising Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  5. Allview Acres, Inc. v. Howard Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Traylor v. GraftonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Shoreham Developers, Inc. v. Randolph Hills, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. Laurel Race Course, Inc. v. Regal Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Bargale Industries, Inc. v. Robert Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Loda v. H. K. Sargeant & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API