Legal Opinion
Metz v. Heflin
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 8, 1964No. [No. 423, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
Ernest W. Heflin and Mabel, his wife, by written contract dated September 14, 1962, and signed September 20, agreed to sell to Nathan Metz for $100,000 some four and a half acres of land in Montgomery County which was zoned R-90. A part of the contract language was as follows: “Property is sold subject to a minimum of R-20 zoning to be obtained at expense of Purchaser. This contract will expire and become void by April 30, 1963, in the event that said zoning does not take place” (The Heflins agreed to take back a first trust of $70,000, “subordinated to construction and permanent loans to be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Griffith v. ScheungrabCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Brier v. OrenbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- Allview Acres, Inc. v. Howard Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Hill v. BeneviczCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Boulevard Builders, Inc. v. SnyderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Canaras v. Lift Truck Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Laurel Race Course, Inc. v. Regal Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Della Ratta, Inc. v. American Better Community Developers, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Barnes v. EusterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Scheffres v. Columbia Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.