Legal Opinion
The Industry
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 12, 1928No. 21PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
29 F.2d 29 (1928)
THE INDUSTRY.[*]
NEW YORK & NEW JERSEY STEAMBOAT CO.
v.
SCHOMBURG.
No. 21.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
November 12, 1928.
Haight, Smith, Griffin & Deming, of New York City (Henry M. Hewitt and James McKown, Jr., both of New York City, of counsel), for the Industry.
Burlingham, Veeder, Masten & Fearey, of New York City (Chauncey I. Clark and C. B. Manley O'Kelley, both of New York City, of counsel), for the Viking.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
L. HAND, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).
The fault of the Industry is so plain…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- The Great RepublicSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Robinson v. Detroit & C. Steam Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- The M. J. RudolphCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Long Island R. v. KillienCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895
- The "Illinois."Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Complaint of B.F.T. No. Two Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Lowery v. the Tug Ellen S. BouchardDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1955
- The Holly ParkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- The S. & H. No. 2, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- In Re Landi's PetitionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.