Lowery v. the Tug Ellen S. Bouchard
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
FOLEY, District Judge.
This array of admiralty suits arises from a collision in the Hudson River at a point adjacent to the south end of the City of Albany. Four of the suits involve the original collision and the sinking of two barges and damage to others; the fifth suit is based upon the aftermath of such collision resulting in the running upon one of the sunken barges by the tug, Clayton P. Kehoe. The cases were tried together by the court. Although it is not an easy task, I shall endeavor to discuss them together.
Complexity entered the trial, and now the disposition of the issues, because…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Looney v. Metropolitan RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Eastern S. S. Corp. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1919
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Walter Douglas Nunley v. M/v Dauntless Colocotronis, United States of America and Combi Lines v. Point Landing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Reading Company v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Inland Tugs Company and American Barge Line Co. v. The Ohio River Company, Defendant-Third Party and United States of America, Defendant-Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Walter Douglas Nunley v. M/v Dauntless Colocotronis, United States of America and Combi Lines v. Point Landing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Nunley v. M/V DAUNTLESS COLOCOTRONISDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.