Legal Opinion
Matter of Scaringelli
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided February 6, 1979No. 7810SC247PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERWIN, Judge.
Appellant presents only one question for our determination:
“Did the Superior Court err in finding as a matter of law that the appellant’s work as a teaching assistant was not ‘employment’ pursuant to G.S. 96-8 (6)g.l5., and therefore G.S. 96-14(1) is not applicable and no disqualification thereunder shall be imposed?”
We agree with appellee that his employment did not constitute “work” within the meaning of the statute. We find no error in the order entered by the Superior Court.
Our Legislature’s purpose in enacting the Employment Security Act is set forth in G.S. 96-2:
“§ 96-2.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Matter of UserySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Wyka v. Colt's Patent Fire Arms Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Matter of UseryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- In re the Claim of AugustineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eason v. Gould, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Lynch v. PPG IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Radvanovsky v. Maine Department of Manpower Affairs Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Radvanovsky v. Maine Department of Manpower Affairs Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981