Legal Opinion

Matter of Usery

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1976No. 7627SC452PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Claimant makes six assignments of error but only two of them are brought forward and argued in his brief. He treats them together, and we shall do the same. Thus, the sole question before us is whether the Superior Court erred in upholding the Commission’s order that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits.

G.S. 96-14 provides in pertinent part:

“Disqualification for benefits. — An individual shall be disqualified for benefits:(5) For ¡any week with respect to which the Commission finds that his total or partial unemployment is caused by a labor dispute in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re SteelmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Buchholz v. CumminsIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  3. In Re the Appeals by the Employees of the North River Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Nelson v. Texas Employment CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Basso v. News Syndicate Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Matter of UserySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Matter of ScaringelliCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Pfenning v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API