Legal Opinion
Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 26, 2010No. Nos. 04-16688, 04-16720PublishedCited by 156 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge HAWKINS; Concurrence by Judge GRABER; Dissent by Judge IKUTA; Dissent by Chief Judge KOZINSKI.
MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs allege that Wal-Mart, Inc., discriminates against women in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. After detailed briefing and hearing, the district court certified a class encompassing all women employed by Wal-Mart at any time after December 26, 1998, and encompassing all Plaintiffs’ claims for injunctive relief, declaratory relief, and back pay, while creating a separate opt-out class encompassing the same employees…
2Cases cited107 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by156 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Wolin v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Robert Radcliffe v. Experian Information SolutionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Ginger McCall v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
151 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.