Legal Opinion

Robert Radcliffe v. Experian Information Solutions

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 22, 2013No. 11-56376, 11-56387, 11-56389, 11-56397, 11-56400, 11-56440, 11-56482PublishedCited by 251 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge GOULD; Concurrence by Judge HADDON.

ORDER

The opinion filed on April 22, 2013, and published at 2013 WL 1715422, is amended as follows:

At slip opinion page 23, lines 17-19, replace < Conflicted representation provides an independent ground for reversing the settlement and the awards of attorneys’ fees and costs.5 Cf. Rodriguez II, 688 F.3d at 656-60. > with the following:

Conflicted representation provides an independent ground for reversing the settlement. Cf. id. (citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a)(4), (g)(4)). Because we reverse the settlement, we must also reverse the awards of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by251 opinions

  1. Theodore H. Frank v. Netflix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Ontiveros v. ZamoraDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
  3. Bellinghausen v. Tractor Supply Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  4. Daniel Greenberg v. Procter & Gamble CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  5. Gregory Berry v. LexisNexis Risk and InformationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015

246 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API