Legal Opinion

Taake v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1896No. 2387PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.—Hon. Richard Osborn, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

This is an action against the city of Seattle for alleged injuries sustained in falling through an unguarded hole in the street. The respondent moves to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the plaintiff sued the respondent city and the Seattle, Lake Shore and Eastern Railway Company. Judgment was rendered against the plaintiff and in favor of both defendants. From this judgment, plaintiff took his appeal by one notice directed to both respondents, *93and gave one appeal bond to both respondents as joint obligees. Since the appeal, the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Seattle & Montana Railway Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lautenschlager v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Prather v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Tait v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Whitacre v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Barr v. Cowlitz CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API