Legal Opinion

Sutthoff v. Maruca

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1910No. 8236PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, McCredie, J., entered April 17, 1909, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

This action was commenced by J. H. Sutthoff against Nicola Maruca, Donatella Maruca, his wife, and James Donofrio, to rescind a contract for the purchase of real estate, and recover, with other damages, $3,000 partial *103payments of purchase money theretofore made. On March 21, 1907, one W. A. Sutherland, plaintiff’s assignor, entered into a written escrow ‘ agreement with the defendants for the purchase of two tracts of land in King county. Deeds for the separate tracts, designated “A” and “B,” were deposited with the agreement. The latter deed only is involved in this action. As to it, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Burks v. DaviesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Primm v. WiseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Webb v. HancherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Holmes v. HolmesNew York Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Underwood v. TewWashington Supreme Court · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. DC Farms, LLC v. Conagra Foods Lamb Weston, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. Marshall v. GilsterIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Colpe v. LindblomWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Bozdech v. Montana Ranches Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Gillmore v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API