Legal Opinion

Webb v. Hancher

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 8, 1905PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from, Palo Alto District Cowl. — TIoN. W. B. QuartoN, Judge. This is an action in equity to recover the contract price of certain real estate, and to establish and foreclose a vendor’s lien thereon. The trial court rendered a personal judgment against the defendant, and decreed and foreclosed a vendor’s lien upon the property. Defendant appeals.'

1Opinion of the CourtDeemee, J.

March 5, 1901, plaintiff entered into a contract for the sale of a part of the land in controversy to one Burgess. At that time he (Webb) did not have title to the property. He held a contract for the purchase of the land from one Reece, which provided for a conveyance from Reece to Webb on March 1, 1902. Reece held no title, but had a contract of purchase from one Aurner. The Reece-Aurner contract made time the essence of the contract, and provided for forfeiture on default of payment of the purchase price. The Webb-Burgess contract provided that Webb should furnish an abstract showing good…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ormsby v. GrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Stevenson v. PolkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  3. Primm v. WiseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Luse v. DeitzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  5. Martin v. RobertsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Fagan v. HookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Breen v. MayneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Martin v. RobertsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Michigan Home Colony Co. v. TaborCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  5. Nelson v. ChingrenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API