Legal Opinion

Rand v. Merrimack River Savings Bank

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 7, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

The power of the superior court to grant the plaintiff’s petition depends in part upon whether the bank commissioner in wind ing up the affairs of an insolvent bank under the provisions of P. L., c. 268, is an officer of that court or an administrative official whose acts are exempt from judicial control except in enumerated instances. If his position is essentially that of a receiver, he is subject to the orders of a court of equity (Rockwell v. Dow, 85 N. H. 58, 68; Eastman v. Bank, 58 N. H. 421), and the superior court in the exercise of its chancery powers may authorize him to borrow…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clifford v. West Hartford Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. McConnellTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Blades v. Hood Ex Rel. Savings Bank & Trust Co. of Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. In Re Cashmere State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Riches v. Hadlock, Bank Com'r.Utah Supreme Court · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Attorney General v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API