Legal Opinion
Eduardo De La Torre v. Cashcall, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 21, 2017No. 14-17571; 15-15042PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The central issue in this case is whether the interest rates on consumer loans of $2500 or more that are governed by California Finance Code § 22303) which provides no interest rate limitations on such loans, can be deemed unconscionable under California Finance Code § 22302 and thus be the predicate for a private cause of action under the California Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”). The answer to this question could determine the outcome of this matter and there is no controlling precedent. We therefore respectfully request that the California Supreme Court exercise its discretion to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Jacquelin Davis v. O'Melveny & Myers, a California Limited Liability CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- California Grocers Assn. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Carboni v. ArrospideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- De La Torre v. CashCall, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2018
- Larry Binkley, et al. v. Uponor, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2026