Legal Opinion
Dade v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided May 30, 1996No. Civil Action 95-0683PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
STACY, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Magistrate Judge is Defendant Southwestern Bell Telephone Company’s (“SWBT”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 15) pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On June 9, 1995, the parties consented to trial before United States Magistrate Judge Frances H. Stacy. Pursuant to such consent, United States District Judge Melinda Harmon referred the case for all matters to Magistrate Judge Stacy.
Following a hearing .on April 4,…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McKenzie v. Lunds, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Hayes v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Carrasco v. City of Monterey ParkDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
- Brown v. University Of Texas Medical BranchDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2024
- Lorman v. Family DollarDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.