Carrasco v. City of Monterey Park
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PREGERSON, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The defendants contend that the action is barred by the 90-day statute of limitations governing actions for employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1). Having considered the contentions of the parties, the declarations submitted in favor of and in opposition to the motion, and the testimony of the plaintiff in an evidentiary hearing under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Henry G. Mack v. South Bay Beer Distributors, Inc., Dba Bay Beer Distributors, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Elizabeth SHERLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Payan v. Aramark Management Services Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Darden v. CARDINAL TRAVEL CENTERDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2007
- Payan v. Aramark ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007