Legal Opinion

Dumouchelle v. Duke University

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 3, 1984No. 8314SC924PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

A motion for summary judgment is properly granted under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 56(c) of the Rules of Civil Procedure “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Lowe v. Bradford, 305 N.C. 366, 289 S.E. 2d 363 (1982). Summary judgment is a somewhat drastic remedy and should be granted cautiously, especially in actions alleging negligence as a basis of recovery. McNair v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lowe v. BradfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. McNair v. BoyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Kyles v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Gurganious v. . SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brown v. Matthews Mortuary, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Whitehair v. Highland Memory Gardens, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Ace Chemical Corp. v. DSI Transports, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Courtney v. St. Joseph HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Perry v. Saint Francis Hospital & Medical Center, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API