Gurganious v. . Simpson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.
The right of a father to prosecute an action for damages for the wrongful mutilation of the dead body of his son has been established by the decisions of this Court (Kyles v. R. R., 141 N. C., 394, 61 S. E., 278; Floyd v. R. R., 167 N. C., 55, 83 S. E., 12; Morrow v. R. R., ante, 127), and this principle has been extended to include an action based upon an unauthorized autopsy. Stephenson v. Duke University, 202 N. C., 624, 163 S. E., 698. The right to bury the dead is generally treated as a quasi right of property, and the mutilation of the body held actionable. Kyles v. R. R., supra; Larsen…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Larson v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Kyles v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Floyd v. Atlantnc Coast Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Moffitt v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Stephenson v. . Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Scarpaci v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Smith v. HefnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Epps v. Duke University, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Moore v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Gallimore v. SinkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.