Legal Opinion

Fairclough v. Board of County Commissioners of St. Mary's County

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 4, 2003No. CIV.A.DKC 2001-4012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHASANOW, District Judge.

Presently pending and ready for resolution in this employment discrimination and breach of contract case are (1) Defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint or, in the alternative, for summary judgment and (2) Plaintiffs motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(f) for an order denying Defendant’s motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, for a continuance on a ruling on that motion pending discovery. The issues have been fully briefed and no hearing is deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs motion will be denied in…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Khoury v. MeserveDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
  2. Pilger v. D.M. Bowman, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API