Legal Opinion
Pilger v. D.M. Bowman, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 3, 2011No. Civil No. WDQ-10-0597PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAM D. QUARLES, JR., District Judge.
Charles Pilger sued D.M. Bowman, Inc. (“Bowman”) for violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”),1 the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”),2 and Maryland law. For the following reasons, Bowman’s motion for summary judgment will be granted in part, and denied in part.
I. Background3
Bowman is a trucking company headquartered in Williamsport, Maryland. Charles Pilger Dep. 29:6-8, July 29, 2010. Id. It has nine repair facilities, including one in Williamsport, and others in Frederick, Maryland, Somerset, Pennsylvania, and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Glynn v. IMPACT SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, INC.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Glynn v. Impact Science & Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Allen v. Baltimore County Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
- Edson Appleton v. Orange County School BoardDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2026
- Maine v. AzarDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.