Legal Opinion

Weishaar v. Strimbu

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1991No. 58786PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harper, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellee, Frank L. Weishaar, Jr., instituted an action against defendants-appellants, George and Livia Strimbu, in the Rocky River Municipal Court on September 14, 1988. In his complaint, Weishaar alleged that the Strimbus failed to perform all the conditions of an oral lease agreement, failed to provide an agreed to written lease agreement, and took retaliatory action in violation of R.C. 5321.02, thereby causing him to vacate the leased premises and to incur expenses. Appellants appeal from the judgment entered against them by the trial court which awarded $2,727.10…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. StumpfOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Delfino v. Paul Davies Chevrolet, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Slife v. Kundtz Properties, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Wineburgh v. Toledo Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Geoffrey M. Radvansky v. City of Olmsted FallsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. In Re KimbleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
  3. Saydell v. Geppetto's Pizza & Ribs Franchise Systems, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Ferguson v. StraderOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Dawson v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API