Legal Opinion

Delfino v. Paul Davies Chevrolet, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1965No. 38918PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

Appellant bases his right of recovery on any one of the three separate and independent grounds. First, that Section 2719.01, Revised Code, rendered the lease valid; second, that a court of equity under its powers of reformation may reform this lease and render it valid; and, third, that part performance has removed this lease from the operation of the statute of conveyances (Section 5301.01, Revised Code). We will consider appellant’s arguments in that order.

Section 5301.01, Revised Code (127 Ohio Laws 1039, 1108), in relation to the execution of instruments, provided as follows:

‘ ‘ A deed,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wineburgh v. Toledo Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Tier v. SingreyOhio Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Entertainment Associates, Ltd. v. Hamilton County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Gleason v. GleasonOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Manifold v. SchusterOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems v. OditaOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Weishaar v. StrimbuOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API