Legal Opinion
Geoffrey M. Radvansky v. City of Olmsted Falls
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 14, 2005No. 03-3798PublishedCited by 465 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Geoffrey M. Radvan-sky (“Radvansky”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees, the City of Olmsted Falls (“the City”), Police Chief Jeffrey Rice (“Rice”), Detective Thomas Caine (“Caine”), Officer Ralph Saxer (“Saxer”), and Officer Thomas Telegdy (“Telegdy”) (hereinafter “Appellees”). Radvansky was arrested by Telegdy and Saxer after breaking into a house, in which he was renting a room. Despite the officers’ pre-existing knowledge that he was currently involved in a dispute with his landlord, his…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by465 opinions
- Gregory v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Rondigo, L.L.C. v. Township of RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Richard Wesley v. Alison CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Laney v. FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Donald Bennett v. City of EastpointeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
460 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.