Mesich v. Board of County Com'rs of McKinley Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BRICE, Chief Justice.
This action was brought to recover compensation for the taking and damaging of private property for public use. At the close of appellants’ (plaintiffs’) testimony the trial court sustained a motion of appellee (defendant) for an instructed verdict, and thereupon judgment was entered for •appellee.
In passing upon the motion the trial court was required to assume the truth of all that part of the testimony which ■supported appellants’ case, together with all favorable inferences that could be reasonably deduced therefrom and discard all unfavorable testimony and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Clinton v. . the Hope Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Watson v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Kindred v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Kares v. CovellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Telman v. GallesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Gregg v. GardnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Michelson v. HouseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- Garver v. Public Service Company of New MexicoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Seal v. Safeway Stores, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
- Garcia v. Garcia Ex Rel. Estate of GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.