Legal Opinion
D'AMBLY v. EXOO
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 1, 2021No. 2:20-cv-12880Unknown
1Opinion
Not for Publication UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DANIEL D’AMBLY, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 20-12880 v. OPINION CHRISTIAN EXOO a/k/a ANTIFASH GORDON, et al., Defendants. John Michael Vazquez, U.S.D.J. Presently before the Court is Defendant Cohen, Weiss, and Simon LLP’s (“Defendant” or “CWS”) motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). Defendant seeks to dismiss Count XIII of the Amended Complaint, which asserts a legal malpractice claim. D.E. 74. Plaintiff Daniel D’Ambly (“Plaintiff” or “D’Ambly”) filed a brief in opposition, D.E. 81,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Burtch v. Milberg Factors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.