Legal Opinion

Wenz v. Wenz

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided January 29, 1935No. Petition for Divorce, No. 66PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, C. J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

At this term I declined to proceed with the hearings in several uncontested divorce cases, of which this case was one, for the reason that the petitions were defective.

In this, as well as in the other cases, motions to amend the petitions were offered, and leave to present arguments in support of the motions was granted so that it might be deliberately determined whether prior decisions of this court disallowing amendments of divorce petitions should be adhered to, or a more liberal policy inaugurated.

In the instant case, the petition was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Console Master Speaker Corp. v. Muskegon Wood Products Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1928
  2. Jester v. JesterSuperior Court of Delaware · 1914
  3. In re VeaseySuperior Court of Delaware · 1927
  4. Southern Maryland Trust Co. v. HenrySuperior Court of Delaware · 1931
  5. Tucker v. TuckerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Central National Bank v. Industrial Trust Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1947
  2. Harrington v. HarringtonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1937
  3. Jones v. JonesSuperior Court of Delaware · 1937
  4. Wife D. v. Husband D.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API