Legal Opinion

Southern Maryland Trust Co. v. Henry

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided May 8, 1931No. 36PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harrington, J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

It is not denied that Samuel J. Henry, of No. 1 East Bradley Lane, Chevy Chase, Maryland, and S. J. Henry of the same address are one and the same person; that being true, no question of new parties is involved in the plaintiff’s application to amend.

The defendant claims, however, that notwithstanding that fact, neither the affidavit of demand nor the attachment affidavit can be amended. He further claims that as the latter affidavit is the basis of the whole proceeding it necessarily follows that neither the caption of the suit nor the writ…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Console Master Speaker Corp. v. Muskegon Wood Products Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1928
  2. Jester v. JesterSuperior Court of Delaware · 1914
  3. Sindowski v. SindowskiSuperior Court of Delaware · 1911
  4. State v. Jessup & Moore Paper Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1910
  5. Taylor v. TaylorSuperior Court of Delaware · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. CaplanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Bothe v. DennieSuperior Court of Delaware · 1974
  3. Wenz v. WenzSuperior Court of Delaware · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API