Legal Opinion

In re Veasey

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided July 15, 1927No. 222PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

The petition for the writ of ad quod damnum was filed by • Veasey within the fifteen days required by the Statute. No effective writ was ever issued. The issuance of this writ was a ministerial duty and we are not inclined to so interpret the statute that the failure to issue a sufficient writ within fifteen days mentioned in the statute would prevent a subsequent issuance of such writ and thus prevent an appellant owner from having a legal valuation placed upon his property summarily taken from him. We are, therefore, of the opinion that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Elbert v. ScottSupreme Court of Delaware · 1914
  2. Jester v. JesterSuperior Court of Delaware · 1914
  3. State v. Jessup & Moore Paper Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1910
  4. State v. MooreNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Console Master Speaker Corp. v. Muskegon Wood Products Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1928
  2. Wenz v. WenzSuperior Court of Delaware · 1935
  3. Southern Maryland Trust Co. v. HenrySuperior Court of Delaware · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API