In re Veasey
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Rodney, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
The petition for the writ of ad quod damnum was filed by • Veasey within the fifteen days required by the Statute. No effective writ was ever issued. The issuance of this writ was a ministerial duty and we are not inclined to so interpret the statute that the failure to issue a sufficient writ within fifteen days mentioned in the statute would prevent a subsequent issuance of such writ and thus prevent an appellant owner from having a legal valuation placed upon his property summarily taken from him. We are, therefore, of the opinion that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Elbert v. ScottSupreme Court of Delaware · 1914
- Jester v. JesterSuperior Court of Delaware · 1914
- State v. Jessup & Moore Paper Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1910
- State v. MooreNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1899
3Cited by3 opinions
- Console Master Speaker Corp. v. Muskegon Wood Products Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1928
- Wenz v. WenzSuperior Court of Delaware · 1935
- Southern Maryland Trust Co. v. HenrySuperior Court of Delaware · 1931