Central National Bank v. Industrial Trust Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the CourtCarey, J.
Consideration must be given first to the motion to dismiss and the petitions to amend, for a decision in favor of the purchaser on either of those matters would make unnecessary any attention to the substantive points of the controversy.
The sale actually took place on July 20 but the original petitions set forth the date as July 26. This mistake is obviously immaterial because the date of sale could have been omitted entirely without invalidating the petitions. Other information therein set forth is ample to fully inform the purchaser of the nature of the proceeding and to enable him to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Union Nat. Bk. of Ptgh. v. CrumpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Central Realty Co. v. Board of ReviewWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1931
- In re Downham Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1932
- In re AdairSuperior Court of Delaware · 1936
- In re Seaford Hardware Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Burge v. Fidelity Bond and Mortg. Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Soliman v. Spencer (In Re Spencer)District Court, D. Delaware · 1990
- Girard Trust Bank v. Castle Apartments, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1977
- Home Beneficial Life Insurance v. Blue Rock Shopping Center, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1977
- MacDonald v. First Interstate Credit Alliance, Inc. (In Re MacDonald)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.