Legal Opinion
DuBose v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided February 14, 1996No. 0007-94PublishedCited by 243 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CLINTON, Judge.
Appellant filed a motion to suppress evidence, claiming that he had not consented to a warrantless search of his person. After the trial court denied the motion, appellant pled guilty to possession of less than 28 grams of methamphetamine and “true” to two enhancement paragraphs. The trial court assessed punishment at 30 years confinement. Appellant appealed the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. The First Court of Appeals held that the trial court had erred, reversed the judgment and remanded. DuBose v. State, 864…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by243 opinions
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Nicholas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- State v. IbarraCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- Ex Parte MartinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
238 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.