Legal Opinion

Bard v. Rose

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 3, 1962No. Civ. 6661PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.

This is an appeal by answering defendants, hereinafter called defendants, from a judgment declaring certain tract building and use restrictions unenforceable as to plaintiffs’ lots.

Facts

While there was some conflict in expert opinion, the facts are without substantial conflict. In 1923 the “Peveler” tract at Palm Springs, California, containing 12 building lots, each lot being 137% feet by 100 feet in size, was subdivided through map recordation. The tract is bordered on the east by Avenida de Los Palos Verdes, on the north by Tachevah Drive and on the west by Indian Avenue. A north and south…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Key v. McCabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Strong v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Wolff v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Rice v. HeggyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Asociación de Vecinos de Villa Caparra, Inc. v. Iglesia CatólicaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1986
  2. County of Butte v. BachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Mason v. FarmerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  4. El Di, Inc. v. Town of Bethany BeachSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  5. Estate of ZaludCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API