Legal Opinion

Smith v. American and Efird Mills

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 21, 1981No. 8010IC965PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

This case presents us with the question of what compensation an employee may recover under the Worker’s Compensation Act [the Act] for disability due to an occupational disease which at its inception was only partially debilitating, but which developed over time into a totally disabling condition. The employer argues that there is no evidence that the employee’s condition progressed from partial disability to total. We disagree.

The Industrial Commission found as a fact that after being forced to leave the Mill, the employee had been able to work from 1968 to 1974 and again in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Henry v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Young v. . Whitehall Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Pratt v. Central Upholstery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gupton v. Builders TransportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Roper v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Effingham v. THE KROGER CO.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Dowdy v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Gray v. Carolina Freight Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API