Legal Opinion

Heywood v. Sooy

California Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1935No. S. F. 15380PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Plaintiff and respondent moves to dismiss an appeal by defendant from an alleged nonappealable order. The action is one for a partnership accounting after voluntary dissolution, appointment of a receiver, and determination of all property rights of the interested parties. After findings made the trial court entered an “Amended Interlocutory Decree” in which it was adjudged that an accounting be had, fixing the interests of the parties in “three particular matters "of the firm’s copartnership business in controversy”, and finally determining and setting out each one with particularity and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gunder v. GunderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Hollar v. Saline Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Kinoshita v. HorioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Learned v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Kinoshita v. HorioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Mengue v. FuerstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API