Kinoshita v. Horio
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SABRAW, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment directing the dissolution of a partnership and sale of its assets. We hold that such a judgment is interlocutory and that the appeal must therefore be dismissed under the “one final judgment” rule.
Facts
The pleadings establish that plaintiff Shigeo Kinoshita and defendants Toshio Horio, Michiko Horio, and James Horio formed Asagiri Co., a limited partnership, to own and operate an apartment building. A written partnership agreement specified the percentage interest held by each partner. Plaintiff alleged and defendants failed to deny that…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- McCorkle v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kinoshita v. HorioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986