Legal Opinion

Mengue v. Fuerst

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 7, 1936No. 3702Published

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

On April 6, 1933, the appellant filed an application for patent in the United States Patent Office on an alleged new, original, and ornamental design for a bottle. On April 10, 1933, the appellee, Edwin W. Fuerst, also filed in that office an application for a design for a bottle. While there are some slight differences, it is conceded by the parties that the designs are, for all practical purposes, identical. Thereupon an interference was declared in the office between said applications. The appellant, being the senior party, relied upon his application for proof of conception and reduction…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Heywood v. SooyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Evans v. FielderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API