Ceeder v. H. M. Loud & Sons Lumber Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay. (Cobb, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
Ceeder sues for wages, claiming a hiring for the season of 1889 at $3.50 per day, and setting up a discharge without cause before the expiration of his time.
One Aiken says that, in the spring of 1889, H. M. Loud, who was the president of the company, instructed him to go to Bay City, and employ two sawyers for the season, at $3.25 per day each; that he went to Bay City, but was unable to get his men at less than $3.50 per day, and sent word to Loud by one Chase, and wired Peter*543son, who was the superintendent of the mill, to meet Chase; that he received the reply telegram the same evening, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Adams Mining Co. v. SenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Eureka Iron & Steel Works v. BresnahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by35 opinions
- Grand Trunk Western R. Co. v. HW Nelson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- St. Clair v. RutledgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Mayger v. St. Louis Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923
- Dover Copper Mining Co. v. DoengesArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Taylor v. Sutherlin-Meade Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1908
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.