Legal Opinion
Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Lindsay
Texas Supreme Court
Decided April 4, 1990No. C-9303PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
Respondents’ motions for rehearing are overruled. The per curiam opinion of February 28,1990 is withdrawn and the following is substituted.
The question in this original mandamus proceeding is whether a trial court’s order granting summary judgment of an initial claim also disposed of all issues pending in a counterclaim not addressed in the order. A majority of this court answers no and holds that an order granting summary judgment as to one claim but not disposing of all issues presented in a counterclaim is an interlocutory judgment.
The lawsuit underlying this…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Teer v. DuddlestenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Houston Health Clubs, Inc. v. First Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1959
- Baker v. HansenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by54 opinions
- Hyundai Motor Co. v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Welch v. McDougal, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1994
- Munawar v. Cadle Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
- Walker v. Sharpe, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
- Avmanco, Inc. v. City of Grand PrairieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.