Legal Opinion

Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1959No. A-7237PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court of Civil Appeals has dismissed petitioners’ appeal, holding that the summary judgment granted by the trial court in favor of respondents and against petitioners on one phase of the case is interlocutory and not appealable. 320 S.W.2d 915. No severance was ordered by the trial court, but petitioners say that the case involves two entirely separate, severable and independent causes of action, and that the summary judgment disposes of all issues and parties involved in one cause of action. They argue that under such circumstances the granting of the motion for summary judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Myers v. SmithermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  2. Richards v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Gallaher v. City Transp. Co. of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Riggs v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Teer v. DuddlestenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Pierce v. ReynoldsTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Schlipf v. Exxon Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. City of Beaumont v. GuilloryTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. LindsayTexas Supreme Court · 1990

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API